1. U.S. v. Jones: The facts of this case are dealing with government place a GPS ( brooding device) on the defendants car, without a search warrant, tracking his movements for a month. This was then said to be justified because the car was on public streets so the fourth amendment doesnt apply.
The court of appeals denied the business line implying that you cant track a persons movements for an extensive amount of time, because the government would gather more info about your everyday life, then just the location of the car. The Constitution is potentially violated in this case because the use of privacy-invading technologies. Providing the courts with all the evidence reveals this case as an unconstitutional search. This illustrates the conflict amid the freedom of individual privacy and the order from the governments political values. But the government argues that it needs the power to track suspects as a way of protecting the order in society, keeping tabs on potential criminals.
2. Planned Parenthood v. Betlach: The facts of this case are dealing with an Arizona law that prohibits Planned Parenthood...If you emergency to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.