Running head : TECHNOLOGY : CALLON S TOOLTechnology : C entirelyon s slam for sociological AnalysisName of StudentUniversity /CollegeProfessor /InstructorClassTechnology : C every(prenominal)on s Tool for Sociological AnalysisTechnology is increasing the world s quality of sustenance . all the same , non all inventions brought about by proficient advancements require positive personal effects on indian file . Some cede initiated changes in the sociological structure that eliminate lead to a decline in social constancy . Technology and so have varied and diverse effects to society . Sociologists of the stick have al evidenceive styles set about this enigma . They atomic number 18 having a hassle to analyze the effects of varietys in a society since often of the changes that innovations bring argon unpredictable . M ichell Callon changes this sociological problem into a progressive method of analyzing society by victimisation engine room and innovationsCallon believed that engineering could be a stopcock kinda of a problem in society . Throughout his evidence , he suggested a spic-and-span path of looking at technology as a hammer rather than as a subject of analysis . The only action sociologists have to do is to look at it in a incompatible purview . He suggested that by seeing technology in the eye of those who invent it , they would non only understand the forces that atomic number 18 shag technology but also use these forces and methods in their avouch analysis Sociologists have long been declared that innovation is a linear process , which describes technological development as a succession of steps from the birth of an idea to its commercialization (Callon 1989 ,. 83 . To Callon , this butt joint be changed by suggesting a spanking way of looking at innovation and techn ologyThe author has express that in the pro! cess of innovation , technical issues are not the only concerns (Callon , 1989 ,. 85 . From the very beginning , all set out issues are in cooperation with technical issues whether they are social , semipolitical or cultural .
Callon is right in saying so , for all issues and problems in the process of innovation already induce it from the very dawn of an innovative project . What makes it more entwine is the fact that each issue is actually affected and rig on other problems as well . Thus , all elements are intertwined with one another . This makes the perspective of linearity a myth since if elements in society are interconnected in a complex web of processes then , linearity is not enough to analyze all the elements as well as the relationships between these elements . He accomplished explaining this by the use of the bitstock conflicting parties in his example of the innovation of the automobile , which is a good simile to better portray the theories of Touraine and Bourdieu , both of which are linear theories of sociological analysisTo address this issue , Callon introduces a overbold way of using technology as a tool for sociological analysis . He pioneered the actor network corpse which is based on the use of technology as a tool for sociological analysis . This actor network sight be used to look at society the way the engineers in his example...If you want to get a full essay, Blessed order it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.